DH2LM: Daisy Hill to Logan Motorway upgrade, what's up?

A billion in funding but nothing’s happening. What’s up?

Supposedly scheduled to be complete before the 2032 Olympics, before the addendum was added, this project has been in the spotlight for a while.

Significant local support from residents, MPs and councillors alike but it really doesn’t seem the State Government wants to move a budge ever since they have completed the business case over 2 years ago in 2024. It’s further frustrating that congestion is continuing to worsen and impact not just private vehicle users on the highway but local vehicle users and buses like the 555, 569 and 581.

Brent Mickelberg has recently issued a statement, blaming the previous Labor government for their failure to progress the project after the business class was complete in 2024, but he hasn’t outlined any action for the future completion of the project other than the addition of an addendum relating to potential cost blowouts.

Additionally, while I’m not confirming whether the current or previous governments have been pork barrelling, if you compare the economical benefits and costs of the DH2LM project compared to The Wave, you can see that the BCR of The Wave is significantly lower than DH2LM. In the IA evaluation of The Wave, they note that low ridership of the line could become problematic for the economic viability of the project. You can make up your own discussion on how things worked out for their voters in the Sunshine Coast.

DH2LM is being pegged to the Coomera Connector Future Stages project, with the extension to Logan Motorway. The IA evaluation makes note of the bottleneck and congestion shifting south near Beenleigh, however, it does not account for reduced car usage as a result of the busway extension and active transport links. This is just adding further complications to a temporary problem that will ultimately be resolved by the time Coomera Connector hooks up with the Logan Motorway.

DH2LM is just the final piece of the puzzle for Logan Residents and the tens of thousands of new users per day expected to use the corridor over the next decade. I would also like to reiterate I’m not making a specific point here about whether this project should go ahead, and the political climate behind it, but feel free to discuss it here. I look forward to what you have to say about this :slight_smile:

1 Like

The TMR renders feature artics on the future Loganlea Road busway station (optimism ahead for Clarks’ 8 artic fleet?) hmmm

1 Like

Clarks hasn’t ordered any new artics

I know but its nice to tease about the future

Seems like TMR is putting the project on pause for the moment, which is a real shame because the business case was completed in 2023 (I note back to Brent Mickleberg’s statement about Labor being indecisive about the project).

1 Like

Its a cool project though. Three new busway stations from Springwood to Loganholme, and extension of the V1 Veloway. Hopefully it doesn’t carry dust, like Stage 3 Ipswich Bus Upgrades.

1 Like

2 new busway stations

1 new bus station

2 Likes

I see the merits of Loganlea road busway station (direct arterial road access to Loganlea train station), but Chatswood Road seems a bit dubious to me.

I’m intrigued about the Beenleigh-Redland Bay Road station, though, as this might foreshadow a future upgrade of route 282 (Hyperdome to Victoria Point).

1 Like

They are designed to be park n ride major stations like Rochedale; they aren’t that well designed to encourage TOD

2 Likes

Send it to Loganlea I beg of TMR

The existing road from Slacks Creek PnR is plenty, plus the 560 and 562 already provide great links

Aside from the potentiwl walk up catchment at Chatswood Rd, it opens up the possibility for John Paul College students to transfer from other services there to get to school. That isn’t its primary aim I’m sure, but it is a nice benefit.

I would argue “barely acceptable” rather than great, but that doesn’t mean I think extending the 282 is the right answer, either.

560 runs every 30 minutes, 6:15 am to 7:15 pm weekdays, and only hourly, with even less span on Saturdays and less again on Sundays/PH.

562 is hourly all days, 6:10 am to 5:10 pm weekdays, with reduced span on Saturdays, and even further reduced Sundays/PHs.

It’s really not a good service.

560 needs to start an hour earlier, run every 15 minutes from 7-7, and finish no earlier than 9:30 pm, IMO.

1 Like

I already have something in the mix to fix the 560 and 562 and plenty of other Logan routes as well. One of the things is increasing the 560s frequency to every 15 minutes in peak, as well as every 30 minutes for the 562. However, in Translinks tabled documents from the 2000s they had highlighted how important cross-link routes like the 550 and 560 are in Logan, so when the busway comes along, they’ll know how to improve these connections and improve service quality as a whole.

1 Like