The heritage carriages do not really match any modern platform heights, as seen here at Roma Street. On past heritage train trips, people just used the landing steps, even though it was a little awkward as the lower step sits slightly lower than the platform level, so disembarking you step down backwards then back up. For any prams, they were just passed over a gap.
However, this time (and possibly last year as well?) QR brought ramps that fully bridge the gap between the platform and the carriage landing, which made access and bringing on prams, etc much easier and safer.
Itās actually a vinyl wrap over the āfinalā sign which you can tell based on the embossed lettering showing through the vinyl wrap when close. I doubt the Tx numbering will be on the sign underneath either though. The order for the sign would have gone in long ago.
Looks great. I do wish BCC got more of the City Cycleway completed because I wouldnāt recommend riding a bike through Albert Street even at low speed. These shared zones are pretty numpty for bikes and a true green spine would delineate scooters and bikes a bit better or push them onto the roads (protected bike lane / CBD cycleway) and remove a loading zone (particularly since all new builds must have their own loading and utility vehicle parks internally).
So apparently the testing of CRR has started. Do you really think that this process will take 3 years to complete? How much time did Melbourne take to test their Munnel before operation?